In the summer, the Constitutional Court examined the story of a businessman whose criminal case had been pending for ten years. The statute of limitations on prosecution had expired, but the investigators refused to terminate it because the businessman did not agree to non-rehabilitative grounds. The Constitutional Court explained what to do, but helped the law enforcement officers rather than the suspects and the accused. Also in the selection of decisions of the Constitutional Court is the application of a former individual entrepreneur to recover contribution debts and the closing of a gap in the law that the legislator had simply forgotten about.