The woman signed a tenancy agreement for a two-room flat and moved in with her family. Subsequently, the flat was declared unfit for habitation and the family moved out. The district administration felt that the flat was no longer needed and sued to terminate the contract. The defendants argued that they were relocating because they were not safe to live in the house. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which explained when one cannot be deprived of the right to use social housing.